The changes to the NDIS announced last month were huge and the most significant since inception. But it’s important to recognise the scheme’s always been shape-shifting.

In fact, the image used to illustrate this post actually comes from an Australian Federation of Disability Organisations post late last year. At the time, the government again insisted the changes would “make the NDIS more sustainable and participant-focused.”

Apparently they didn’t and that’s why it’s easy to be cynical. But this time, doing that would be wrong.

The mood in government now is that these changes will stick. Barring an unlikely back-track from the Opposition, they will be passed. And if the states hold out and refuse to provide services, Canberra insists it won’t pick up the slack. So it’s worth getting our heads around the detail of what’s going to happen.

Fortunately that’s exactly what some of the sharpest minds in the sector have been doing. We’ve collected some of the most recent (and best) of these here so that you can browse them yourself. Enjoy!

The most useful public explainer is the ABC’s five-point guide but the best short explanation of the NDIS changes is the article by Helen Dickinson and Ebe Ganon-Davey here (re-published in the Medical Journal of Australia).

People with Disability Australia has the strongest sector explainer on what the changes could mean.

The most accessible explainer is Inclusion Australia’s Easy Read, while the most useful operational link for providers is from Team DSC.

[continued from the newsletter]

__________________________________________________________________________

The missing piece in all the explainers is certainty.

Most agree on the broad direction: fewer people on the NDIS, tighter eligibility based on functional capacity rather than diagnosis alone, delayed planning reform, more provider oversight, tighter payment systems, and an attempt to shift some supports outside the scheme.

What they can’t answer is the question participants most need answered: who will actually lose support, when, and what will be there instead. Critically, a new $200 million Inclusive Communities Fund will not replace the individualised support being removed from plans. It will certainly change it.

For provider and operational readers, Carer’s Network, Mable and Brevity are useful practical guides. Scope and Aruma are best read as provider-facing updates to their own clients and communities.

The Conversation carried an earlier, more discursive explainer from a crack team of analysts with top-level experience of the NDIS.

UTS dissected brilliantly what the changes will mean for people in supported accommodation. It explains what commissioning could mean for supported independent living, group homes, provider choice and community participation. This is particularly important because people living in group homes often have high and complex support needs and may be most exposed to changes in social and community participation funding.

From a business perspective, SCOPE offers this roundup. Mable has another individually-focused take here. Brevity Care is focused on mandatory registration, budget reductions, compliance and financial planning..

From the Carer’s Network. a useful timeline-style guide. It gives specific dates for social and community participation changes, plan management commissioning, eligibility boundaries and provider registration.

From PACfA a description of how current psychosocial NDIS participants are likely to remain unaffected, while access rules will change. Aruma carries a guide for SIL vetting, mandatory registration and pricing.

From Sydney Care Support and participants in Sydney, this offers a simple provider guide

Enjoy!