
Olga Heywood Tennison, a philanthropist and former actress who donated $45 million to La Trobe University
Labor is beginning to fund autism support outside the NDIS. The question is whether it is building the alternative system before people are pushed out — or after.
Labor has found $11.1 million for autism research and yes, this matters. La Trobe University’s Olga Tennison Autism Research Centre will receive the money over three years to establish an Australian Autism Knowledge Hub. La Trobe will add another $3.8 million, taking the total investment to almost $15 million.
That’s generous, but so was Olga Tennison herself. The former actress re-used plastic bags and wore op-shop clothing as she carefully saved money, before funding the Centre with her original $6 million donation.
That was as the NDIS was just getting started.
The Hub will now turn autism research into practical tools, guidance and policy. It’s co-designed and jointly led by Autistic people. This is what reform is supposed to look like. Money outside individual NDIS plans. Evidence converted into support. Autistic-led design. Practical tools for families, services and governments.
But timing matters.
The announcement lands one day after Labor struck a deal with the Greens to extend the Senate inquiry into its NDIS bill by eight weeks. The inquiry will now report on 14 August.
The point is that Autistic children and families are central to this political fight. The government wants more supports to exist outside the NDIS. That is reasonable. But those supports need to exist before people are moved out, not after.
[continued from the abilityNEWS newsletter]
_______________________________________________
The autism hub is a positive announcement because it points in the right direction.
It recognises the obvious problem. Australia has produced plenty of autism research. It has not always converted that research into usable systems for Autistic people, families, schools, services or governments.
The new Hub is supposed to close that gap. It will create tools, frameworks and guidance. It will support co-produced and Autistic-led research. It will bring together researchers, service providers, governments and the Autism community. It will also build capability across the sector and align work with neurodiversity-affirming, trauma-informed and culturally appropriate principles.
That is not a small thing. It is also not enough.
The NDIS bill has become the place where every promise about “foundational supports” is being tested. Labor’s problem is not simply that people dislike cuts. It is that the alternative system is still being described, designed and announced while the legislation is already moving.
The Greens used Labor’s need for Senate support on tax changes to secure a two-month extension of the NDIS inquiry. The deal will help pass changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax, while extending the NDIS inquiry and adding amendments to curb ministerial powers and improve transparency. The Greens still say they will oppose the NDIS bill.
The Guardian’s analysis was sharper. Labor may have won its tax deal, but the price could be the NDIS. The extra eight weeks give the disability community and the Greens a platform to keep pressure on the bill, while the Coalition’s support becomes more important and less certain.
This is why the autism announcement matters politically.
It is evidence the government understands the reform task is not just cutting plans. It must build a wider support system. It must spend money outside the NDIS. It must prove that children, families and Autistic adults will not simply be pushed from one overstretched system into nothing.
The Hub helps make that argument - but only partly.
Research is not support. Guidance is not a service. A framework is not an appointment, a therapy session, a classroom adjustment or a trusted place for parents to go when they are told their child no longer belongs inside the NDIS.
The government is beginning to put the pieces in place.
The problem is that it is doing so belatedly, under political pressure, while asking parliament to pass the cuts first and trust the architecture later.
